Skip to main content
The Government of Bermuda Home

Are there any additional types of licences which should be considered?

From "A Regulated Cannabis Scheme for Bermuda"

Go to the project

Are there any additional types of licences which should be considered? 

Comments(64)

Commenting is not possible because this project is currently not active.
Most recent comments have loaded.
I oppose this proposed legislation
    An intent to wholesale (no retail) licence.
      @Nicke Smith 100% agree.... I will be writing in to state that.... Also need to think about sale and distribution of seeds and trees. It is not covered under retail or cultivation licences.
        • Analytical testing licence should be considered as a separate and distinct licence type from the Research licence, as qualifications of personnel and instrumentation will likely differ. • Consider including a nursery licence as a distinct licence type that focuses only on starting materials (plants and seeds) and is not prohibited to flower plants and conduct post-harvest activities such as drying. • Consideration for licence types that allow for distinct operating sizes e.g. micro-cultivation licence versus standard cultivation. This would allow for a threshold cap for smaller sized operations and would require less security that a larger operating size. • Consideration of other licences for ancillary cannabis services (off-site cannabis destruction, irradiation services). • Consider providing licensing for cannabis wholesalers, which store cannabis product and serve as a link between cannabis producers and cannabis retail stores. • Consideration should be taken for the ability to combine licence types e.g. cultivation and processing. • The Bermuda Cannabis Act allows for the consumption of cannabis at cannabis stores, but limits cannabis stores from selling food or drink. This combination presents the situation where hungry or thirst patrons would consume additional cannabis-infused edibles or beverages, to this end, consider a licence class for a consumption lounge where patrons could bring cannabis and consume non-infused food and drink. • Consider if online delivery of cannabis to consumers will be permitted and if that service will be provided by retail store owners or a separate service and licence accordingly.
          @Doyle Butterfield Completely agree with a nursery licence and a wholesale licence as neither are dealt with in the current licence structures.....
            @Doyle Butterfield Schedule 4 Section 6: A licensee shall only sell the following forms of cannabis or cannabis products— dried cannabis; cannabis oil; fresh cannabis; edible cannabis; cannabis extracts; cannabis topicals; No mention of seeds or small plants.... However, to your penultimate point, I believe edible cannabis should be expanded to include beverages as well.
              Further information needs to be provided regarding import and export regulation and to promote cannabis being grown locally by Bermudians.
                @Stratton Hatfield furthermore, they need to allow for local distribution and sale of bulk cannabis. Would these be under a manufacturing licence? Becuase it states cultivation licence can only sell with written consent from Minister. So would someone need a Cultivation Licence and a manufacturing licence to be a wholesale provider of ganja to the retail stores?
                  Cannabis distribution should be permitted for online shops and in bricks and mortar retail settings.
                    Delivery licenses should be issued to allow for retail shops to deliver cannabis to consumers/patients .
                    • 2 likes
                    @Stratton Hatfield Pharmaceutical, cigarette and booze deliveries require no such license, why is the bar higher for a safer alternative?
                      @Paul Giraud - if they are going to propose this for cannabis, they should require it for all these substances also iMHO.
                        License fees should be partially refundable if a license is not granted to ensure that people are not dissuaded from applying.
                        • 2 likes
                        Personal home grow licences should be made available to the public to grow plants on their private properties. People should be able to apply for a home grow license per plant and should pay up to $50 per plant for up to 10 mature plants maximum.
                          @Stratton Hatfield I wholeheartedly disagree my fiend, that is extortion plain and simple. Remove cannabis from the drug schedule and repeal the anti cannabis laws.
                            @Paul Giraud this was my attempt at finding some form of middle ground between those on both sides of this topic. I will always be proposing for more liberalisation but I'm weary of those that are opposing these policies too.
                              @Stratton Hatfield Natty never get weary. Don't give up, there ain't no giving in, cause when the going gets tough, the tough get going. Bless up. Which policies are you weary of "those" that are opposing anyway, the prohibition holdovers? Me? Can you stop and consider how people who have been abused for years for no good reason feel?
                                @Stratton Hatfield I forgot to mention there are not "good people" on both sides of this you have the oppressors and the oppressed. Why on earth would the people who have been wronged in so many ways for so long unjustly, find middle ground between wrong and right and pander to the people who had zero concern about those whose lives were destroyed wrongfully? That is PC at it's worst.
                                  Profile of Jamie Weir
                                  Posted by:Jamie Weir
                                  6 years ago
                                  Imho, to effect the potential for greater overall recovery from the economic impact of COVID-19, the better approach might be to encourage an indoor-growing cottage industry. Setting guidelines for some level of fungibility should serve as a quality assurance effector; a cost recovery initiative could produce a balanced approach regarding genotype (promoting Sativa growth, as opposed to a "rush-to-market"-induced, Indica-laden homogeneity); utilizing compact florescence and light's inverse square law in a vertically cylindrical configuration at less than a foot's distance should magnify lumen output and avoid overtaxing electrical supply (individual plant growth, while smaller, allows for a greater output number-wise. Perhaps consideration could be given for this format type; although, technically, clones from a mother plant could still be considered the same plant...). Granting licenses to those who would grow for others (who might lack space or ability; particularly in cases of medicinal necessity) could prove beneficial for all involved. Also, pedlar's licenses for "to you" delivery services could be a game changer; utilizing a proven methodology for unobtrusive delivery, while supporting the growing houses via prompt delivery (of what could be connoisseur varieties).
                                  • 1 like
                                  @Jamie Weir so what will be the costs to implement something of this magnitude, the suggested locations as Bermuda has a damp climate as we are surrounded by water. Are you looking at the plant nurseries to be the front runners for this? If so, exclusivity again with those who better buying power. Simplicity is the name of this one right here. There are persons who have been farming for long periods of time with a product that is accepted and requested by their clients and these persons know their stuff. I am also not saying scrap what you are saying, but that is a down the road stage to me?
                                  • 1 like
                                  Profile of Jamie Weir
                                  Posted by:Jamie Weir
                                  6 years ago
                                  @Lisa Hollis As a cottage industry, I would be looking at people who wish to add to the "consumable collective" the ability to do so (thus the suggestion of some method to effect a fungible standard). Ideally, the retail pricing would be dictated by simple supply and demand, yet affording smaller scale growers some protections against exclusion from markets by larger-scale producers (or from POS establishments). Because of the local shortage of arable land, I suspect most smaller-scale commercial growers would be growing indoors. Humidity levels could be controlled through ventilation through activated-charcoal filtration systems; although illegality not being an issue, regular timed ventilation could be sufficient (assuming no ordinances, etc. against strong scents). I believe the larger outdoor nurseries would be better suited for "organic" growth; possibly for majority-Sativa subtypes also (due to their extended flowering time, and typical "lankier" profile). People with growing knowledge/experience could (theoretically) grow a roomful of Cannabis buds from one plant (theoretically: by training the vegetative growth cycle along a horizontal profile utilizing the FIM and SOG/SCROG techniques. Practically: doing the same or similar with maybe three plants). The method I had outlined previously would entail a vertical growth method using more readily available and less expensive equipment (eg. standard moguls and compact-florescent, low Kelvin bulbs vs. HID HP Sodium bulbs and ballasts [plus the accompanying high capacity ventilation and/or air conditioning to control heat output]). CFL bulbs tend to have an acceptably lower heat output to effect closer placement to growing plants (allowing an amplification of the inverse square law of lumen output at distances less than one foot), while distributing light omnidirectionally (as opposed to LED bulbs [which cost significantly more per bulb, with typical lumen spreads of 150 degrees maximum], or LED strips [costly; usually specially ordered; may be problematic depending on environment]). In my opinion, the more important request to make of Government right now would be to extend this consultative process by about another month...
                                    There should be consideration for a license for restaurants, bakeries, and/or the sale of edibles in perhaps mixed environments outside of retail cannabis establishments. There are many ways to prepare cannabis for consumption, as well as ways to control dosage. There is a market for restaurants to have special cannabis delicacies, much like they have special cocktails. There needs to be a provision for personal growth. Whether it is completely legal up to a certain number of plants, or whether there is a license to be acquired for a nominal fee, this legislation should address personal growth of marijuana for personal use and provide a framework for it. Economically empowering certain segments of our society has been mentioned as a goal of this legislation. If we are to genuinely put money back in the pockets of a greater number of people, personal growth is an avenue for that. Homeowners and families must be able to navigate and manage personal growth, personal use, and children. Parents & retailers have to navigate access to tobacco and alcohol already, we manage to ensure children don't eat oleander trees but we have them in our yards, even though they are poisonous. There cannot be government profit or control over every part of consumption, growth, and sale of cannabis. There are enough avenues for the government to profit and there should be ways for the average man to profit or at least reduce expenditure.
                                    • 1 like

                                    Share

                                    Current status

                                    proposed