Skip to main content
The Government of Bermuda Home

For Your Consideration

From "REGULATING SINGLE-USE PLASTICS IN BERMUDA: Policy paper for public consultation"

Go to the project

I would like to remember the people who are pushing this legislation that Bermuda is already expensive and the cost of items being increased due to more expensive alternatives needs to be considered.

The primary restrictions on imports to help the island should be more electric vehicles although they use power the degrees in noise pollution and the fact that Bermuda is a perfect size to implement such a change of phase out of gasoline burning vehicles, as they do have propane powered vehicles in the world now.

The reduction and elimination of products that wrap items in multiple layers of plastic should be banned. This goes for food items and electric items, which commonly have multiple layers of plastic for no reason other than aesthetics, not for protection while in transport.

The micro beads and products that contain them should be banned from point of import. Straws are of the same concern as are the plastic ties that hold soda cans together. As all of these risk our ocean life and enjoy for all.

It should also be noted that take out food items, like plastic forks, knives, and containers are not required to be banned. In Bermuda all garbage is burned and as such, an increase in cost for food should not be encouraged, as a result of the higher cost of these ‘environmentally friendly’ take out items which most do not manage well or stand up well with takeout foods.

Thank you for your consideration as I’m sure that you have all experienced what I have pointed out. As for the phase out. Of the products for food takeout, should you wish to continue with that. It should be banned from point of import as of a specific date and whatever people have should be reused, used, and stocks depleted without the import there can be no new additions and no additional requirements to enforce the legislation. I acknowledge that should a company order a years supply and delay implementation, it is an acceptable allowance; as stock can only be depleted.

Going above and beyond what is required, will have the same impact as the sugar tax increasing prices and providing retailers with an excuse to increase prices on items. As the majority resent the sugar tax as a result of the vast majority being impacted financially and the upper class thinking it is a brilliant idea. Sustainability must be acknowledged for all, the wealthy and the poor.

Comments(1)

Commenting is not possible because this project is currently not active.
Most recent comments have loaded.
Profile of Zach Moniz
Posted by:Zach Moniz
5 years ago
I am unclear what you mean by retailers having an excuse to increase prices on items. When tax increases from 0% to 75% on an item what do you expect to happen to the price of that item? I know at Lindo's the price changes only took effect as items were received and the tax was applied. We sold through inventory that we had before generating a new price based on the new landed cost of the item with the new tax applied. What was not considered or anticipated was the broad brush or scope of items that the sugar tax would impact. The tax is applied by tariff code. Whatever falls in the tariff code has the tax applied. Things like granola bars or coffee creamer were not expected to be impacted but were because of the applied tariff. I fear the same will happen with this legislation. Plastic bags and Styrofoam trays will be banned. Mostly all fresh chicken imported comes prepackaged in Styrofoam trays. Things like Frozen chicken and cereal all come in plastic bags. The number of items that will fall in the list of prohibited items will be a eye opener when the grocery stores shelves are empty. Also - given the expense for wrapping an item if is far more desirable not to wrap items in the grocery industry. But there is a tradeoff. Wrapping preserves the shelf life of the item. Some things that are not wrapped will turn into waste. Not being able to preserve the life of produce items will become a nightmare in an already difficult environment. All produce goods sit on a boat for three days before arriving in Bermuda. Retailers are given a small window of opportunity to move through fresh produce. I am not saying is can't be done - but more waste will bring higher prices in an already expensive jurisdiction. Some will rightly argue that there is also a cost to bear in not doing anything with increased cost in trying to rid the earth of plastic.
  • 3 likes

Share

Posted by

Current status

proposed

Tags

Cleanliness and waste
Sustainable development
Energy and technology
Health and welfare
Social inclusion